This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
I note the article is currently tagged for multiple issues but I do not really agree that those are valid issues. The tagging states "It needs additional references or sources for verification"; that "It relies largely or entirely upon a single source"; that "It needs sources or references that appear in third-party publications"; and that "It may contain improper references to self-published sources." Since the article is about World Heritage Site listings, and the World Heritage program is an entirely reliable source about that program, I don't see that there is any problem at all. The WHS sources are not self-published by the wikipedia editor(s) who are developing this article. Sure, adding any other commentary, if available, about the WHS program, would be fine too. But, I am inclined to remove the tagging shortly, though I'll wait for responses. doncram (talk) 23:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'd support the removal of the information per my rationale on the peer review. Nev1 (talk) 23:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Following is an extract from a larger draft table of WHS sites, now with coordinates of these Nederlands WHS sites, from the WHS. Feel free to cut-and-paste from here, to add coordinates into this article. doncram (talk) 17:10, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Museum de Cruquius article states that it is a WHS, but it doesn't appear on the table. I'd add it myself but am not sure of which criteria it meets. Mjroots (talk) 07:38, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There's no WHS in the Netherlands under that name [1], could it be called something else? Nev1 (talk) 09:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unless I'm missing something, the museum doesn't seem to be a World Heritage Site. It's not on the list under that or a similar name (all 8 sites are in the table above) and none of the sites correspond with the coordinates given in the article on the museum. Nev1 (talk) 16:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
