Talk:List of Unilever brands

Brands Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

edit
history
watch
purge

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

More brands (Russian market)[edit]

Creme Bonjour (cheeselike goo) [1]
Beseda (tea) [2]
Pyshka (baking mix) [3]
Clear Vita Abe (same as simply Clear in other markets?) [4] // - NVO (talk) 09:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sun Brands[edit]

Wisk, Snuggle, etc. are no longer Unilever. They are owned by Sun Products now and are gone from the Unilever website. I guess these should be removed, is a former brands section is needed?ChrisJsc (talk) 06:36, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Band[edit]

"Blue Band — family-aware: margarine, bread, cream alternatives" see also Haugh, East Ayrshire (creamery). "The original spreadable margarine / Perfect for spreading, cooking & baking / High in monounsaturates / Low in saturates (underlined) / "--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 07:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heartbrand[edit]

The List of Unilever brands#Ice Cream section, which primarily documents the "Heartbrand", is quite detailed. Why does Heartbrand re-direct here, rather than having its own article with this content? —sroc (talk) 12:07, 19 June 2013 (UTC) There seems to be no reason to split Heartbrand, given that it fits easily on this page along with the other brands. Klbrain (talk) 22:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Unilever brands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061123065631/http://www.unileverbestfoods.com/ourbrands/foods/Heartbrand.asp to http://www.unileverbestfoods.com/ourbrands/foods/Heartbrand.asp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070308164012/http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_20020618/ai_n12613254 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_20020618/ai_n12613254

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of Unilever brands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100102004220/http://unilever.com/images/ir_ar08_annual-report_tcm13-163124.pdf to http://www.unilever.com/images/ir_ar08_annual-report_tcm13-163124.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100513071220/http://www.unilever.com/brands/foodbrands/blueband_rama_countrycrock_doriana/index.aspx to http://www.unilever.com/brands/foodbrands/blueband_rama_countrycrock_doriana/index.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100619232940/http://www.tigihaircare.com/consumer/en-NZ/home/ to http://www.tigihaircare.com/consumer/en-NZ/home/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting Heartbrand[edit]

I'd argue that the Heartbrand definitely justifies its own article. The Heartbrand design is one of the biggest candy brands in the world. This List article should more just list different brands. I already wrote an article a two weeks ago but was reverted (by @Lithopsian). UnkreativeFrog (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a formal proposal for a split, using one or more of the split templates will generate more visibility for your idea. A formal split proposal with (mostly) support will not get reverted (or if it is, the split will be enforced by other editors). Lithopsian (talk) 12:31, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@UnkreativeFrog, Lithopsian, Mafmafmaf, Mr. Lefty, and Satori Son: — I have added the requisite template and support a split. The 17-year-old merge request was on the basis that the Heartbrand article content was "already fully reproduced inside the Unilever article". There is now barely a mention of Heartbrand in Unilever, and the current redirect target List of Unilever brands#Desserts is just a patchy list jumbling regional Heartbrand aliases, brands within Heartbrand, other Unilever ice-cream brands, and non-ice-cream brands. Many of the Heartbrand aliases and products are not listed at all, and there is no history. In theory one could add the missing info from UnkreativeFrog's version to the Desserts section (perhaps in a Heartbrand subsection) but this article would become lopsided and also no longer be simply a list. jnestorius^(talk) 01:58, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also @Sroc and Klbrain: given their 2010 discussion above. jnestorius^(talk) 02:02, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No objections from me if you think that references sources independent of the producer are available to support a separate article. The idea is that articles should be encyclopedic rather than a product catalogue or advertising brochure. Klbrain (talk) 13:40, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a wikipedia expert, but i'd like to add that it took considerable effort for me to find out the British Heartbrand alias (Wall's), even though i was fully aware of there being different localized sub-brands. 2A02:A46C:8141:1:31B1:4290:405E:AD6F (talk) 22:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Nogger" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Nogger has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 24 § Nogger until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 00:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]