Talk:Lillestrøm Stadion/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 12:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I shall review.

Lead
  • No issues what-so-ever
History
  • Date formatting stays the same, grammar is fine, I see nothing wrong.
Facilites
  • Seems OK, glad that Åråsen stadion is not linked, however needs capitalising.  Done
Events
  • Nice, short section. Nothing bad to say.
References
  • No issues.

Thanks! TAP 12:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: