Talk:Ligonier Meeting

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is derived with permission from "Ligonier meeting" at OrthodoxWiki. OrthodoxWiki copyright policy changed on 11/22/05 to be compatible with Wikipedia. The article this page is derived from was started prior to that date, but the version used has only been edited by users on OrthodoxWiki who have retroactively agreed to relicense their contributions in a way compatible with Wikipedia. Mangojuicetalk 14:53, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"28 or 29"[edit]

This statement seems a bit out of the blue: "Whether there were twenty-eight or twenty-nine bishops actually present, there are twenty-eight pictured in the group photograph taken at the meeting, and there are twenty-eight different signatures on the documents." Why then mention 29 at all? Who thinks there were 29? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 23:53, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Ligonier Meeting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]