Talk:Lemarchand's box

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 March 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Horror

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles

Untitled[edit]

It seems that the neutrality of this article needs to be assessed... I see a claim on this page that the movie version of LeMarchand's history is "less interesting", which is hardly neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.7.144.203 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 8 February 2006

This is an ongoing problem with the later Hellraiser articles. I'll fix. Canonblack 01:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stub?[edit]

This article feels pretty complete. Stub template removed. ▫ UrbaneLegend ^talk 15:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merchandising spin-offs?[edit]

Just out of curiosity, has the film studio arranged production of puzzle boxes that resemble those used in the movie as closely as feasible, for sale to the general public? 70.15.116.59 08:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, go ahead and delete this.[edit]

Nothing about Wikipedia is more exhilarating than encountering red links that used to link to material you're interested in but no longer link to anything at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.76.204.200 (talk) 22:55, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]