Talk:Le roi d'Ys

Overtures

This seems odd - can anyone now add random recordings of an overture to an opera article? Cg2p0B0u8m (talk) 21:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

I was happy to see this old Paray performance added to the article (I did not add it), and there is no more appropriate place for it right now. Many of these early Mercury stereo recordings made quite an impression when they were first released, both sonically and also as performances, and are of some historical significance. This is probably why so many have been released on CD: there are enough of us around who remember their initial releases who will be interested to buy the CDs. So I don't see this as a particularly random selection. However, I can understand your concern, so I've added another source which supports including it. --Robert.Allen (talk) 08:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

I think there is a danger that people come along and add their favourite recording or conductor (with a reference of course). This happened already, for instance at La Jolie Fille de Perth (where I changed the section and left a simple description of the suite) and Le festin d’araignée where a random recording was twice added back in – so I have given up and just added more to make it look less odd. There must be other cases.

Here, I could for instance write something about the Suisse Romande recording with some nice quotes from a magazine (which I have); someone else could do the same for Pierné and so on. I am not sure what it would add to an encyclopedic article (about this piece rather than a performer or orchestra), nor if it would be tolerated for, say, Meistersinger.

(I am not questioning the veracity of this section or the performance by Paray) Cg2p0B0u8m (talk) 21:03, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Le roi d'Ys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060923090704/http://www.musikmph.de/musical_scores/prefaces/F-L/lalo_leroy.html to http://www.musikmph.de/musical_scores/prefaces/F-L/lalo_leroy.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090104011856/http://dept.lamar.edu/kvlu/NPRWOO.html to http://dept.lamar.edu/kvlu/NPRWOO.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071209135353/http://resmusica.com/aff_articles.php3?num_art=4402 to http://www.resmusica.com/aff_articles.php3?num_art=4402

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:01, 19 December 2017 (UTC)