Talk:Lazarus Saturday

Holidays Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Saints / Catholicism / Eastern O. / Oriental O. Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Saints portal This article is supported by WikiProject Saints (assessed as Low-importance).
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled[edit]

This article mentions that the "fast is somewhat mitigated" on Lazarus Saturday so that wine and oil are allowed. Wine and oil are allowed on every Saturday and Sunday during Great Lent and Holy Week, so this does not point out any special place for Lazarus Saturday.^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.127.93.39 (talk) 04:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://goarch.org/chapel/calendar/

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lazarus Saturday. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070516080729/http://www.transfigcathedral.org/faith/Bulgakov/index.shtml to http://www.transfigcathedral.org/faith/Bulgakov/index.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Picture appropriateness[edit]

Please see the discussion that up to now has been at User_talk:Lipsio#article_"Lazarus_Saturday"-_2nd_picture. Basically, Micheledisaverio replaced an icon with a very nice Italian oil painting. I reverted that because "If the article were about the Raising of Lazarus, that would be appropriate, perhaps even as the primary picture. But, since the article is about an Eastern Orthodox holy day, only icons, methinks, are appropriate." A discussion ensued, making me opine that others' input be solicited. Meanwhile, for good faith, I've edited back in the added picture in addition to the one it had replaced Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 14:10, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everybody. We have agreed about the fact that since the article is about an Eastern Orthodox holy day, only icons, methinks, are appropriate. With an exception for the italian painting, and its special technical ability. The third picture, even if it is/has been placed in a Church, or something similar, seems to have some "unclear and ambivalents" forms or meanings. It does not hurt my personal faith, but this is possible for other people...

There are some pictures on wikipedia commons, at this link: all the three pictures now present in the article are listed in this category. Therefore, anyone possibly interested to the discussion may suggest an another choice into this category. Or add a new picture at all.Micheledisaverio (talk) 19:50, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://goarch.org/chapel/calendar/

[1]