Talk:Lamparello v. Falwell

IP Law WikiProject

This is a part of the IP Law WikiProject. Thanks! LisaFowler (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Case name

Shouldn't this be Lamparello v. Falwell, rather than Falwell v. Lamparello? See [1], [2]. TJRC (talk) 01:59, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

It seems that's the convention! It's moved and referring wikilinks corrected. Thanks. LisaFowler (talk) 04:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Did you know?

This article should be eligible for appearing on the main page as a "Did you know" entry, if you nominate it soon; it is supposed to be nominated within 5 days of being created.

The instructions for nominating it are at Template talk:Did you know. Basically, all need to do is take this code:

{{NewDYKnom| article= Lamparello v. Falwell | hook=... that ? | status=new | author= LisaFowler }}

and write the hook, a concise and interesting bit of info from the article beginning with "... that" and ending with a question mark. The info from the hook has to be present in the article and supported (in the article) with a citation. Someone will double-check to make sure the source says what it's claimed to say. Once you've come up with a hook, add the above code, including your hook following the "hook=" part, to the top of this section of the DYK template talk page. The code will produce an entry formatted like the others. After that, just keep an eye on your entry; if anyone brings up an issue with it, try to address it. I'll keep an eye out as well. If everything goes well, it will appear on the Main Page for several hours a few days from now.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 16:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

I've nommed: T:TDYK#Articles created/expanded on October 20. Feel free to come up with a better hook. TJRC (talk) 20:58, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lamparello v. Falwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20100105232543/http%3A//www.sork.com/domain/ to http://www.sork.com/domain/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722235450/http://www.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/198936.htm to http://www.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/198936.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100607022125/http://lawreview.wustl.edu/inprint/84-6/lipton.pdf to http://lawreview.wustl.edu/inprint/84-6/lipton.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061214190757/http://www.fallwell.com/ to http://www.fallwell.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:51, 16 December 2017 (UTC)