Talk:Kumawat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kumawat is a Rajput Caste[edit]

202.128.111.4 (talk) 18:39, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —KuyaBriBriTalk 18:44, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 June 2018[edit]

106.207.249.162 (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. L293D ( • ) 00:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

for mutual discussion[edit]

I "Ekdalian" want to discuss increasing knowledge about Kumawat Wikipedia page. There is no sufficient information bro about Kumawat

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=vm_KCE4XXPMC&pg=PA562&dq=%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A4+%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BF+%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AC%E0%A5%82%E0%A4%A4&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwisr_uFrOqFAxW6yjgGHQj5CzQ4ChDoAXoECAIQAw#v=onepage&q=%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A4%20%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BF%20%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AC%E0%A5%82%E0%A4%A4&f=falsehTs reference i

is suit for it-able दीपसिंह 16:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
K. S. Singh (Popular Prakashan) is not considered as reliable by the community. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 18:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks....
This is final as our old written evidence.
https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.494949
Should I change the Wikipedia page based on this reference? दीपसिंह 02:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Everything written in this K.S. singh'book is true bro. If you were from Rajasthan, you would have good knowledge of our culture bro. दीपसिंह 02:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, even if it is true, we can't deviate from our policies regarding use of unreliable source. There's an existing consensus regarding this particular source and we are not supposed to use the same. Please try to find other sources, modern scholarly work by reliable authors. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 09:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for your time
I will continue my efforts दीपसिंह 12:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]