Talk:Kinneloa Mesa, California

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kinneloa Mesa, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

negative tags[edit]

There were the following negative tags marring the article forever and a day, which I just removed and paste here instead:

"This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)

This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2009)

This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (October 2009)"

--Doncram (talk) 17:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no strong feelings one way or the other, but if the issues listed by these templates are still a problem, then why remove them? WP:WTRMT and WP:WNTRMT are clear about this; neither backs up your rationale for removal, however well-intentioned it may have been. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 19:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]