Talk:Kelli Underwood

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Television / Australian rules football Low‑importance

	Australia portal Kelli Underwood is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian rules football (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The writing I've edited has to be one of the most insipid entires I've ever seen for an encyclopedia. The Britannica writers would have junked this quickly if it was intended for their publications.

'Disputed Sources' related to calling GWS the Orange Team[edit]

So a YouTube video of Kelly Underwood calling GWS the orange team isn’t a good enough source, even though it presents evidence of her doing this. But a whole bunch of facts without sources or citations are seen as fine? It has gone viral everywhere. It should be allowed on the Wikipedia page. If it isn’t, when it’s 100% fact, why are all these other facts allowed without sources or citations, are these not disputed too? Seems like someone just wants to make it out like Kelly has never done anything wrong, rather than include every well known event. GwsFan2016 (talk) 12:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has clear guidelines. Content must be sourced to reliable independent secondary sources, and must be written neutrally. What you have added has not met these criteria. If there is a reliable source that has reported this, then please identify it here, and we can have a discussion about whether something on this can be included and if so how. But please also not that wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a news site and so not everything that happens can or should be included, and there are also clear guidelines about biographies of living people that must be adhered to.Melcous (talk) 13:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So then why are there numerous paragraphs without sources or citations? Where is the reputable source? What you have linked also says ‘Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources, i.e., a document or recording that relates or discusses information originally presented elsewhere’. I’ve shown the recording of her saying it. It’s a primary source. And it’s that big the club has changed their Insta bio. This is what she is now known for the most GwsFan2016 (talk) 23:56, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]