This article was nominated for deletion on 10 April 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Would someone do me the courtesy of notifying me when the person who keeps tagging this article as non-notable manages to drum up enough support to delete it? I don't have the mental energy (or the IRL time) to dedicate to keeping a close eye on such shenanigans, so it would be helpful if someone would just drop a note on my page once that person is finally successful. KevinHallward's Ghost(Let's talk) 17:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I reinstated a tag I agreed with that was originally placed by Onel5969 during Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Since it seems there are multiple editors who doubt this article meets notability guidelines (myself included), I started an WP:AFD that you can find here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Beth Hall. This was in no way an attempt to be malicious by either of us; for myself, I am only wanting to follow the Wikipedia's guidelines on WP:BLP and WP:SIGCOV. Cerebral726 (talk) 18:04, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:Beccaynr: Slashfilm and Den of Geek are reliable sources. Wikipedia articles that cite Slashfilm do not go out of their way to point out that it is technically a "blog", and Den of Geek is not considered a blog. Slashfilm is a mainstream news website for films, and so is Den of Geek. Your recent edits were misleading, not clarifying, and they make it seem that you have some kind of agenda here. You have already voted to "delete" at the AfD, and your attacks on the article itself do not seem neutral. Further, your assertion that the Bleeding Cool review was "in reference to Hall's smaller role compared to other cast members" is not supported by the review and require you to make unsupported suppositions. If there is a WP:CONSENSUS at the AfD to delete, then the article will be deleted. If not, then it is not neutral to imply that these reliable sources do not mean what they say about her. -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
