Talk:Kashmore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Pk-sindh.PNG[edit]

Image:Pk-sindh.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Project importance[edit]

Kashmor was listed as mid importance, and I changed it to low importance. While a four box ranking table is a bit severe, it does seem that the immediate need for a suitably well-written article on Kashmor is low. This is based in part upon the relatively few mentions in published materials. While Kasmor, as the northernmost large town in Sindh, is certainly more important than many other places in Sindh that are also ranked "low", it doesn't seem to be of the same importance as the Arabian Sea article or the article on the town of Dera Ghazi Khan which are of "mid" range. --Bejnar (talk) 22:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]