Talk:Jiangnan

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/40056379?seq=1. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help); Text "date" ignored (help); Text "first" ignored (help)

doubt[edit]

I found a sentence: The Wu and Yue were ancestors of modern Vietnamese and spoke completely different languages from Chinese. Is that really true that they were ancestors of modern Vietnamese, how could they immigrate so far until vietnam today. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.48.219.27 (talk) 15:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

neutrality[edit]

Article is written with a Chinese bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.160.24 (talk) 20:35, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

not specifying why (with no specifics) is tantamount to not giving a reason for the tag at all. --HXL 's Roundtable, and Record 22:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jiangnan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170225003321/http://www.cultural-china.com/chinaWH/features/jiangnan/index.html to http://www.cultural-china.com/chinaWH/features/jiangnan/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]