Talk:Jeff Ragsdale

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Twitter as a RS[edit]

I've removed the tweet because I'm kind of worried about this article coming across as too overly promotional. The tweet didn't exactly say that Ragsdale created a new art form. He said that he's an example of a new art form. The phrasing is so loose that it could be construed as original research to say that this is "a new art form" as quoted by Ellis. There is also the issue over tweets not really being usable as reliable sources unless you have other sources to back it up and show that it's anything other than a brief mention by an author on twitter. There's a reason why twitter is almost never used as a source without multiple independent articles to back it up. There is already enough about the book's reception in the articles about the book and Ragsdale. We really need to avoid this being nothing but a love fest for Ragsdale, because at times this really comes across as being overly promotional and an advertisement for him. I also removed the Amazon Top 100 thing, as I'm not really finding any sources that are reporting that this is really an astoundingly noteworthy thing. I'm not trying to say that it's easy to sell a lot of books, just that it's not exactly like reaching the top of the NYT bestselling lists or the USA Today lists. Also considering that some of the lists get uber specific, the accomplishment of being a top anything on Amazon isn't as big of a thing in the publishing world as you'd think. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 16:39, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jeff Ragsdale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jeff Ragsdale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]