Talk:Jade Emperor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Trial Length[edit]

There seems to be some discrepancy regarding the amount and length of the trials the Jade Emperor faces between the Origin of the Jade Emperor section and the Jade Emperor vanquishing Evil section. Were there 1,750 trials, each lasting 120,976 years, or 3,200 trials each lasting 3 million years? Pnkrockr 18:55, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


It should be, because Yuk Wong is just the Cantonese pronounciation of Yu Huang (Mandarin).

are they the same?[edit]

I don't think so.

They are the same. Yuk Wong (Cantonese) is the same as Yu Huang (Mandarin)

Translations[edit]

Are these really good glosses for the characters given?

Grandpa Heaven (天公 Tiān Gōng) ... the Pure August Jade Emperor or August Personage of Jade (玉皇上帝 Yu Huang Shangdi or 玉皇大帝 Yu Huang Dadi)

天公: looks like "Duke of Heaven", but I can see where "grandpa" might be implied
玉皇上帝: looks "Jade Emperor the High God" to me
玉皇大帝: I would say "the Great Sovereign Jade Emperor" or "the Great August Jade Emperor"

Correct me if I'm wrong. - Nat Krause 20:31, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Yes, they all mean and refer to the same thing for Chinese. In our language, there are many variants for an important figure like this Jade Emperor, since we have a habit of adding many nice words to the original name, a kind of expatiation. Like in "玉皇上帝" and "玉皇大帝", the words "上" and “大” mean no more than a symbolic thing, pointing to something supreme or lofty. And that's all. As for "天公", I don't think the English word 'duke' is a proper translation for this occasion though it does sometimes mean 'duke'. And the translation "Grandpa" sounds a little weird to me, too. Whenever I see 天公,I will make out a lofty, emperor-like man in my mind. But still, I have to say 'Grandpa' or 'Old Man' will be a good choice. Chrisliu (talk) 16:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Yu aboard a Goa'uld space station.jpg[edit]

Image:Yu aboard a Goa'uld space station.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Yu aboard a Goa'uld space station.jpg[edit]

The image Image:Yu aboard a Goa'uld space station.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Three Pure Ones[edit]

Is the Jade Emperor one of the Three Pure Ones?--Splashen (talk) 00:26, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccuracies[edit]

Chrisliu's equation of ".....玉皇上帝" and "玉皇大帝", the words "上" and “大” mean no more than a symbolic thing" is historically and linguistically absurd. I still read the same assertion in the Chinese Mythology page of the use of 上帝 was datable from the Oracle Bones, Taoism Stub Editors ought to do something about the accuracy here. 上帝 was never in any Taoist or Chinese text until the New Testament was translated to Chinese. In the Creation section the previous editor added in an older version of Creation, Jade Emperor took on the role of 'Pangu', JE was not Pangu, he never was. I read Dongmin Baoji was a reference, it may be worthwhile therefore to cite from who the current JE is, and whence he was enthroned. ACHKC (talk) 14:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Severe lack of references in here, the first one originating about 4/5ths in Sgtlion (talk) 17:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Four Dragons[edit]

Is there any reason why the most common myth associated wuth him, that of the creation of China's four rivers, is not here? I'd edit it in, but I find its absence conspicuous and ominous, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Falconfly (talkcontribs) 21:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jade Emperor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

topple[edit]

In § Vanquishing evil:

Mountains shook and rivers and seas toppled.

Mountains can topple. Trees can topple. Rivers and seas can't. As defined in Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary:

to fall from or as if from being top-heavy

Water, as a liquid, is already as low as it can go in its current place, and always tries to go lower by running downhill.

--Thnidu (talk) 03:16, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

To add to article: mention of the Jade Emperor's palace, to help explain why "Jade" is part of his name.

元始天尊在清微天中玉京金闕七寶玄苑玉皇宮殿

173.88.241.33 (talk) 21:55, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Four Dragons part needs to be edited[edit]

As it is right now, it's unreadable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rivercosta (talkcontribs) 23:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned it up based on a few different versions of the story found through a google search. I don't have the time to properly source it, but it's readable now. Livingston 11:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jade Emperor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are the primary sources for the myths about the Jade Emperor?[edit]

The article doesn't mention any primary sources for these myths. 58.105.78.220 (talk) 01:51, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Seas toppled"?[edit]

Under the heading "Chinese mythology: Vanquishing evil", the fifth sentence in the fifth paragraph reads "Mountains shook and rivers and seas toppled." This is confusing. To "topple" literally means to fall or be knocked-over, sharing the same root as "top". Obviously, rivers and seas do not have "tops", nor can they be knocked over. In lieu of a source from which one can try to infer the closest translated meaning, I propose it be tweaked to say that "...rivers and seas trembled", since water can certainly appear to tremble (to shake, splash, produce waves, etc.) Any thoughts? Bricology (talk) 07:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]