Talk:Isopogon anethifolius

Isopogon anethifolius is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 10, 2021.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 30, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
April 8, 2016	Featured article candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 21, 2013.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Australian shrub Isopogon anethifolius is named for the resemblance of its leaves to dill?

Current status: Featured article

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Isopogon anethifolius is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Type information[edit]

Could someone please double-check the information about this being the type of Isopogon? Tropicos says the type is I. anemonifolius. Choess (talk) 06:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

APNI agrees with Tropicos, so I'll take it out.--Melburnian (talk) 06:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Isopogon anethifolius/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 11:51, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I must take this - seems I can not keep off your great articles! Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 11:51, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I like this plant more than Isopogon anemonifolius and have bought a few to plant out in my garden...but the other had more information written about it so I did it first. Sadly there are more unknowns with this one but I thought, "What the heck?" I have a bit of a Noah principle and often do these articles in twos... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Do you plan to take this to FAC as well? Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 15:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

endemic to coastal areas near Sydney, Australia and in the ranges to the immediate west Here's some comma confusion. Seems like Sydney and Australia are two completely different areas in the plant's range.

I rejigged it a bit Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~You have expanded the lead very well about the description details. But other parts of the article should also have a good representation in the lead. The second para anyway looks way too short.~~

enalrged Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Description[edit]

...generally taller on more sheltered areas such as woodlands, and shorter in more exposed areas Would be interested to know the "why" of this.

again, finding an explanation will be tricky.... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessary as per the GA criteria, but may be required in FAC. It was actually a suggestion. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 15:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~... and less than 1 mm in diameter Convert. Also in The seed weighs around 4 mg ; ...which have flat leaves and are greater than 1 mm across...~~

converted Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy[edit]

~~Looking at this in the MOS, May 5 1770 is not the appropriate format.~~

fixed Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Where is Rylstone?~~

added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Link Western Australia (if you think it's OK)~~

linked Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Distribution and habitat[edit]

Isopogon anethifolius occurs in the Sydney Basin and surrounds, from Braidwood northwards to Mount Coricudgy in Wollemi National Park, the annual rainfall 900 to 1600 mm (35–60 in) How do you surround rainfall?

heh, tweaked Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Link heathland as you have done in Lead, and lignotuber~~

linked Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ecology[edit]

~~Link bushfire, leaf spotting~~

linked Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cultivation[edit]

Along with I. dawsonii, Isopogon anethifolius is the easiest member of the genus to grow in cultivation Why is Isopogon abbreviated first and then expanded? Should be the other way round.

yep, switched Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~If it is the easiest member to cultivate, it is surely a fact relevant enough for the lead?~~

added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:02, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Link screening plant, germinate~~

linked the latter - nothing to link former to.. Cas Liber (talk·contribs) 13:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The meaning may not be apparent to all at first glance. I researched a bit and found a good explanation for the term which I have added now. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 15:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~I have never seen "an acidic soil". Why have "an" here?~~

sounds ok to me but agree unnecessary so removed Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

though does not tolerate waterlogging Where is "it"?

there's me dropping pronouns again...added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is the difference between Wikipedia and Life. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 15:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is frost tolerant to −8⁰C Convert.

done Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~I think the last line, about the history, should actually be placed somewhere earlier.~~

rejigged Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great job, as always! Those were my comments. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 11:51, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upon my word, that must have been the fastest GA review I have ever done! OK, so now I find no more faults with the article, at least not from the GAN point of view. So I believe this should be good enough to go. Cheers! Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 15:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Isopogon anethifolius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222121647/http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/horticulture/floriculture/australian-south-african/potential to http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/horticulture/floriculture/australian-south-african/potential

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Isopogon anethifolius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160202060213/https://www.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/RoyalBotanicGarden/media/RBG/Science/Cunninghamia/Volume%2011%20-%202009/Cun111131Kub.pdf to https://www.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/RoyalBotanicGarden/media/RBG/Science/Cunninghamia/Volume%2011%20-%202009/Cun111131Kub.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]