Talk:Irreplaceable

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleIrreplaceable is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Good topic starIrreplaceable is part of the B'Day series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 5, 2014.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 18, 2008Good article nomineeListed
March 14, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
March 31, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
March 16, 2010Good topic candidateNot promoted
September 9, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Charts[edit]

I think Irreplaceable is a great song and the fact that it's doing so great on charts over the world is amazing. It is moving really fast on the Billboard Hot 100 and i hope it reaches number 1. I admit she went a little over the top with Deja Vu and Ring The Alarm but she settled it down with this one and everyone I know loves it.

Chart Trajectories[edit]

Whoever deleted the chart trajectories can you not do it again it is more informative and makes the artical larger. I've put some of them back because I can't remember the rest whoever knows more official chart Trajectories for Irreplaceable feel free to add them.

--They also deleted it off Deja Vu and Ring The Alarm.

-- I just found out that trajectories are unnessacery and that they are deleting them from articals this is stupid they were more informative and more intresting for the articals

What the heck is an 'artical"???66.210.114.195
I think they are things that are very unnessacery and intresting. - eo 23:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YES.THEY ARE INTERESTING.BECAUSE PEOPLE DO LIKE THOSE BECAUSE THEY WANNA SEE HOW MUCH IT JUMPS SPOTS AND STUFF..TAKING THEM DOWN WAS A DUMB IDEA.......................

People also like to see the music video. But Wikipedia is not Youtube, nor is it an indiscriminate collection of information. 17Drew 10:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Switch the date[edit]

Can someone please fix the date on the billboard hot 100? Some idiot put December 16, 2006. 75.3.120.43 05:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, whoever put December 16 is not an idiot, because this is the correct date. I know that this particular date may not have occurred yet, but that is the date given to the chart on which "Irreplaceable" first reached number one. The Billboard Hot 100 article explains that the Hot 100 is dated according to the day on which the chart ends, not the day on which it begins, hence the reason that the song's peak position date seems to have been forward-dated. The official Billboard website for this week's chart [1] will confirm that the date on which "Irreplaceable" first reached number 1 is in fact December 16, 2006.--Phil500 (Talk / Contribs) 06:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Video Version[edit]

Does anyone notice the differences between the album and video version? when the video was first released, the background music had no difference, but then after a few weeks released, the music is so different and cooler, much cooler actually.. they got different music instruments, most noticeable at the bridge. So,my point is, how come there's no "video version" on the cd-single? where can I get it? I've been lookin' for it on some file sharing programs but i can't find it...

you are right.. I was wondering where i can get that too.. I prefer the video version much much more instead of the album version. Can anybody help please?? i was hoping that the video version would replace the album version of the song on the re-release edition of B'Day, but nonetheless.. its all the same..... i love the video version so much.. HELP!!

"Bush vs. Beyonce" music video[edit]

I think there should be some mention of the "Bush vs. Beyonce" music video parody. It had an impact on the song because it first suggested there may be political overtones in the lyrics. The video was created by Keith Petrower and can be viewed here: http://www.BUSHvsBEYONCE.com --BeyonceFan85 12:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

I tried to add that info but Bots keep deleting it just because it's a YouTube link. Can anyone help? KeithAllen 22:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chart Performance[edit]

The chart dates should be updated every week. You can just look at the billboard chart and it will tell you the current issue date. Jdot01 07:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ne-Yo wrote 100% of the song, Beyonce just helped out with the melody LOL COOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!![edit]

http://www.power106.fm/audioalbum/neyo.aspx

He gave an interview at Power 106 ^there's the source

Can somebody incorporate that information into the article, I don't know how to word it exactly —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.31.68.14 (talk) 17:51, 2 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Wow I've never seen so much information and analysis just for one song. Incredible. It speaks a lot for the success of this song and possibly the climax of Beyonce's career as a solo artist. Hopefully she can continue on this path. 167.88.178.70 18:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi This is Journee and i have never seen thins much on here either!!!!

The "male version"?[edit]

There is a male version out by someone called "B Boy Truth" called "To The Right". It's HILARIOUS, and here's a link to a stream. I think it's really important to note this, as she incorporates parts of it into her live performance (notably the horns before the first chorus and the repetition of "get to thinkin'" before the last chorus), as well as how well known it is. I can't find any info on "B Boy Truth" though. Ian-sama 08:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And apparently, there's another "response" done by Papoose on Streetsweepers Presents Papoose: The 4th Quarter Assassin: Holiday Hitman also called "To the Right". Ian-sama 05:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sugarland[edit]

Shouldn't it be mentioned that she performed this song at the American Music Awards with Sugarland? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.242.227 (talk) 05:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary removal[edit]

The track "Freakum Dress" was initially the third single for US single and the second international single, however due to the underperformance of the single "Ring The Alarm" "Irreplaceable" was rush released because of its high popularity.

"Irreplaceable" reached number one on the Billboard Hot 100 on December 16, 2006, making Beyoncé's eighth Billboard number-one, and her fourth as a solo artist (her first without a guest rapper)

. It has sold over two million copies in digital sales.[1] It was the last U.S. #1 of 2006 and the first of 2007. It was also the #1 song of 2007, according to the year-end Billboard chart.

"Irreplaceable" was the Billboard Hot 100 number-one single for ten weeks, and has received world wide critical acclaim. In the United States, it has become the most successful song of her solo career. In December of 2006, a Spanish version of "Irreplaceable" entitled "Irreemplazable" was released, which appears on her Spanish-language EP Irreemplazable. This remix has peaked on #4 on the Billboard Hot Latin Songs. It has also been faring fairly well on charts in Latin countries and was included in her re-release of B'Day.

It is nominated in the 'Record of the Year' category at the 50th Annual Grammy Awards to be held February 2008. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 08:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs sources[edit]

A commercial U.S. CD single of "Irreplaceable" was released on January 9, 2007 for purchase. As of January 2008, the song had sold over 3,000,000 copies in digital downloads been certifiated 3 times platinum by RIAA and a further 180,000 across various other formats in the United States. "Irreplaceable" sold 267,000 copies in digital downloads in a week of January 2007, surpassing Shakira's "Hips Don't Lie", which sold 265,000 copies in a week in June 2006. Later in January 2007, Fergie's "Fergalicious" surpassed "Irreplaceable", selling 295,000 downloads in a single week. "Irreplaceable" was the most successful single of 2006 on the Billboard Hot 100, staying at number one for ten weeks, three weeks more than Justin Timberlake's "SexyBack". Overall, it had the longest run at number one on the Hot 100 since Kanye West's "Gold Digger" (featuring Jamie Foxx), which held the summit for ten weeks in 2005. The song surpassed Knowles' "Baby Boy" (featuring Sean Paul) to become her most successful single on the Hot 100 as a solo artist. On the Rick Dees Weekly Top 40 chart, "Irreplaceable" spent seven weeks at number one making it Knowles' most successful song on the chart to date. "Irreplaceable" tied Big Girls Don't Cry by Fergie with seven weeks at number one but finished the year at number two behind "Big Girls Don't Cry". Beyonce's previous number one on the chart was the Swizz Beatz produced Check On It which featured fellow Houston native Slim Thug, spending 4 weeks at the summit of the chart.

Much of the single's success depended on its considerable airplay. On December 11, 2006,"Irreplaceable" passed the 200 million audience impressions mark in the United States, according to Mediabase. This achievement made Beyoncé one of two artists to have one or two songs pass the 200 million impression mark in a single year; the other artist was Mariah Carey in 2005 (with "We Belong Together" and "Shake It Off"). "Irreplaceable" had major cross-over success, becoming the first song to simultaneously occupy the number-one position on twelve Billboard charts on the week ending December 30, 2006, including the Hot 100, Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs, Pop 100, Mainstream Top 40, and Rhythmic Top 40 charts. "Irreplaceable" had the best radio audience week of Beyoncé's career and the second-best sum in the chart's history, with 201.9 million audience impressions. Only Mariah Carey's "We Belong Together" bested that total; it garnered 223 million impressions during a week in July 2005.[2] I have to find sources for some of these. Than you. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 06:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • The video also peaked at number one on Yahoo! Music Top 100.
  • The video was so popular at MTV, it was named the number-one video of 2006 by TRL. On January 18, 2007, "Irreplaceable" retired at number 1 on MTV's Total Request Live, having spent forty days on the countdown, with eleven days being number one, the most days at number one for any Beyoncé video. This was also her third video to retire on TRL, the others being "Naughty Girl" back in 2004 and "Beautiful Liar" in 2007. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 07:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ [citation needed]
  2. ^ Barnes, Ken (January 09, 2007). "Beyonce hits a new high". Blogs.usatoday.com. USA Today. Retrieved 2007-08-02. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

GA Review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written:
    Pass Very well done.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:
    Pass Everything is sourced as it should be.
  3. It is broad in its coverage:
    Pass No problem there.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:
    Pass No problems there.
  5. It is stable:
    Pass No problems there.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
    Pass though I would recommend more images if the article is to be further promoted, and the "track listings" and "Personnel" sections could also be organized into charts.
  7. Overall:
    Pass exceptionally done. -Ed! (talk) 22:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


IF THE 200M AUDIENCE IS TRUE THEN SOMEONE MUST POST IT, IT IS A VERY IMPORTANT ACCOMPLISHMENT, PLEASE TRY TO GIVE THE SOURCES SO WE CAN POST IT! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.177.74.138 (talk) 07:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unaccepted sources and/or content[edit]

  • Ne-Yo revealed that he wanted to make anthems that people can relate to, and that "Irreplaceable" was the result.[1] - From Contactmusic.com.
  • John Jobling on Mansized.com found "Irreplaceable" a "gorgeous acoustic ballad",[2] - From Mansized.com.
  • According to Beyoncé, "[Irreplaceable] is a secret weapon ... It's a celebration of a breakup and makes women feel like they're worth more."[3] Still looking for more reliable source. - From Pr-inside.com.

--Efe (talk) 04:32, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Efe (talk) 10:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Ne-Yo: Video Interview". Contactmusic. Contactmusic Ltd. Retrieved 2008-01-28.
  2. ^ Jobling, John (August 30, 2006). "Beyonce ? B?Day: Controversy surrounds the pop diva's latest album, but is it actually any good? Read our world first review!". Mansized.com. Soma Digital Ltd. Retrieved 2008-01-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. ^ "Beyoncé Creates Break-up Anthem". PR Inside. Retrieved 2006-12-31.
  4. ^ "Beyonce – B'Day". Soma Digital Ltd. August 30, 2006. Retrieved 2007-12-25. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  5. ^ "Beyonce: Irreplaceable". Sony BMG Australia. SONY BMG Music Entertainment (Australia) Pty Limited. Retrieved 2008-02-08.
  6. ^ "Beyonce's 'Irreplaceable' Tops Australian and US Charts". Sony BMG Australia. SONY BMG Music Entertainment (Australia) Pty Limited. (January 17, 2007). Retrieved 2008-01-30. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Awkward Grammar[edit]

  • Some of the passages are really awkwardly written. It seems like they were written by someone (Scandanavian?) without a native grasp of English. Would someone please clean it up? Thanks!
If you believe there all awkward, please copy edit it. Its currently on WP:FAC. --Efe (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly I don't see where the awkward grammar is. What exactly is it that you are referring to ? Mortyman (talk) 23:25, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't know too. It was an IP's concern. Maybe he saw some not-so-good-grammar prior to this article's FA promotion. --Efe (talk) 07:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recording history[edit]

I have read a news from mediatakeout.com that it was Max Gousse, A&R for Music World, who convinced Knowles to record the song. It would be a good information to fill in the gaps of the background section; however, the source isn't reliable. Does anyone here has a link of a more reliable source? --Efe (talk) 08:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

beyonce's best selling single[edit]

in an interview with daddy mathew knowles about that possible delay of the album due to his vice president that knowles has to get head to head, daddy knowles said that how can his VP not be apart of it when it was the one who told beyonce to record irreplaceable which became her BEST-SELLING-SINGLE to date.. it's on the album delay news.. try to check it! so if so irreplaceable should have sold more than 6million because crazy in love sold 6.5m! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.177.74.138 (talk) 07:21, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced Credits and personnel section[edit]

This section is unsourced. Could result in FA delisting. SunCreator (talk) 16:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RIAA certification[edit]

This song is certified 2x platinum for single sales and 3x platinum for master tones. In other words, this song is 2x platinum not 3. 75.22.20.86 (talk) 23:33, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish version charted in some European countries.[edit]

Source. Jivesh • Talk2Me 02:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Genre infobox should be left blank[edit]

As there are no reliable/critical reviews that call the song either a pop, R&B or country western song; the one review that we have that reviews the track calls it a rhythmic song but that could mean anything like a rock, hip hop or even reggae song and doesn't count as reliable Rihanna-RiRi-fan (talk) 19:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

TFAR notification[edit]

I've nominated this article for WP:TFAR consideration, please see discussion at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Irreplaceable. — Cirt (talk) 20:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Live performances section[edit]

Is the content in Live perfomances really warranted? Some of the information, such as that the audience often sings the beginning, could be included. And a few unique performances perhaps. But it seems like a list of dates she performed the song and her outfits, which I don't think is suitable to be in an article about a song. *Seen a Mike* 18:06, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 21 external links on Irreplaceable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Irreplaceable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Irreplaceable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Irreplaceable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Irreplaceable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Irreplaceable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Irreplaceable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Irreplaceable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Irreplaceable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:33, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Irreplaceable&oldid=1207741193"