Talk:Ion G. Duca

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Facts deleted[edit]

Someone is deleting facts that I added. I have read a lot of books about Romanian politicians and it is a fact that this man was murderd as a form of revenge act by Iron Guard fascists. I think a fascist is trying to defend it or something by shortening down facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.248.90.243 (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do see WP:NPOV, WP:WEASEL and WP:PEACOCK. Thank you. Dahn (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ion G. Duca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Last sentence[edit]

"His son, George, edited Duca and George's memoirs while at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University in the 1970s and 1980s." This isn't clear, at least, not to me. The relevant fact for this article would be that the son edited the father's memoirs (which were already mentioned in the previous sentence). If the writer intended to add that the son also edited his own memoirs, it didn't fit well into the sentence and isn't relevant to this article, which is about the father. So I'd write "His son, George, edited these memoirs while at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University in the 1970s and 1980s." Would that be correct and clear? Andrew Dalby 19:34, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]