Talk:Investor relations

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 6 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lsull, Piresml, Cantonite, Sebastianvonw, Acharlton06.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Material and Cleanup[edit]

Added link to public relations and reference to Dept. of Labor. Removed unecessary words for clarity. Added section on Sarbanes-Oxley Act.--Axiomatica 21:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

Did some cleanup on this article. It looks like its origin was as a non-notable company article, but was later trimmed to make it a more general description of the concept. As it stands the article is ok, but it could use sourcing and expansion. --Lendorien 16:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Objection[edit]

The flagged segment reflects a third party's personal opinion and potentially offers a guideline to the reader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.179.77.220 (talk) 06:27, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note ==[edit]

The last paragraph of the "Gamestop" section is not cited and reads in an odd style. The second person imperative is used, leading to a strange stylistic feel.