Talk:Interstate 381 and State Route 381 (Virginia)

U.S. Roads: Interstates / Virginia Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	Interstate Highways
Locations	Virginia
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Virginia

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Why no "Exit list" or "route junctons" list?[edit]

(People want to know junctions, etc.) --Chessecake (talk) 16:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are no exits on I-381 (except I-81), and Rte 381 only has one major intersection before ending at Tennessee. All of which are included in the infobox. --MPD^{T / C} 18:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 381. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060829204604/http://www.virginiadot.org/infoservice/resources/route-index-07012003.pdf to http://www.virginiadot.org/infoservice/resources/route-index-07012003.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I-381 & SR 381[edit]

Does it have to say both in the article header? Why not just I-381 and add SR 381 as a sub-section? --WashuOtaku (talk) 00:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. Current name is, quite frankly, stupid (and inappropriate) Famartin (talk) 00:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it comes from the California I-210/SR 210 combo, which is just as silly. –Fredddie ™ 01:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Split Article[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was not split. –Fredddie ™ 21:45, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to split this page into two separate articles, Interstate 381 and Virginia State Route 381, being that they are technically two separate routes and the current title looks very unusual. Needforspeed888 (talk) 22:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And we could split the California one as well. Needforspeed888 (talk) 22:51, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - There is nothing to gain by splitting them up as they would both say basically the same thing. My recommendation is to remove State Route 381 from the title, but still have information regarding it on this page. We do this already with U.S. Route 23 in Tennessee, which also includes I-26 and SR 137.

Based on the shortness of the two routes together and the fact that this article is the product of a fairly recent merger, I'm changing my mind to Oppose, but I think Interstate 210 and State Route 210 (California) should still be split. Needforspeed888 (talk) 00:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.