Talk:Internet recruiting
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
I like how you delete a cited snippet about Reflik, calling it promotion, but ignore the fact that 3/4ths of this page has un-cited info. Do your job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thewizkid23 (talk • contribs)
- @Thewizkid23: Editing Wikipedia is done on a voluntary basis. It is not our "job". This article is not exactly the cream of the crop and does indeed need reliable sourcing. Of course, that does not mean that inappropriate additions should just be ignored and left in the article. That would not be a step in the right direction. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 05:29, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Apparition11: Stop being so condescending. I know it is done on a voluntary basis. My addition was not "inappropriate." There are more sources for recruiters than those mentioned on the page. Thewizkid23 (talk) 13:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Thewizkid23: If you'd rather me blunt, it is obvious that your goal is to advertise for that company. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing and possibly have the link blacklisted. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 14:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Apparition11: Stop being so condescending. I know it is done on a voluntary basis. My addition was not "inappropriate." There are more sources for recruiters than those mentioned on the page. Thewizkid23 (talk) 13:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)