Talk:Information commissioner

Source[edit]

Good profile of the new Canadian commissioner. --Padraic 22:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 September 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move unopposed (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 03:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information Commissioner → Information commissioner – Common name, written without capitals (as, for instance, prime minister). Geny S. Soboes (talk) 20:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support per name. Used here as a generic job title. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Overlap between this and National data protection authority[edit]

The scope of this article seems to be quite similar to National data protection authority. That one has a better national list, and this one has better text.

Any interest among editors to try to harmonize these two pages? Not necessarily a merge, but perhaps turning the NDPA article into a "list of" and the other one into a more narrative article? Or merging the two articles (it's a LONG list).

One issue would be nomenclature - "Information Commissioner" seems like it's a title that's taken up by specific countries, whereas "Data Protection Authority" seems to be a more global title.

Cross-posting this to the NDPA page to see if there's any interest there. Oblivy (talk) 14:15, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]