Talk:Index (publishing)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A map of contents?[edit]

I deleted "Ideally, an index is not simply a list of the major terms in a publication, but an organized map of its contents." Indexes are usually simply lists, not "maps", aren't they? Nurg 05:54, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually no, they aren't. An index is far more than just a list of terms -- that is more properly called a concordance. An index makes connections among terms in the text (see also references), groups like concepts to make it easier for the reader to find all references to a topic, identifies preferred terms but also adds common terms under which the average reader might expect to find something with a "see" reference directing them to the correct term, and much much more. Bookgrrl 14:30, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You may be confusing the word 'map'. This is not referring to a literal atlas or triptick. This is referring to the use of the word map that is used in relation with mathematics and computing, in that it is a link (rather, a set of links) between you and the content. A set of links, or the transformation of the understanding of your expectation of content, to the actual content, can thought of as "mapping" the content. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jfroelich (talk • contribs) 19:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

syntax query[edit]

I'm not going to be bold and rush in and change it, 'cos maybe I'm just having one of those days, but I reckon that the following subsection:

Index quality

Everyone has experienced a bad index; it's almost worse than no index at all. Some principles of good indexing include:[2]

  • Ensure each of your topics/sections includes a variety of relevant index entries; use two or three entries per topic
  • Analyse your audience and understand what kind of index entries they're likely to look for
  • Use the same form throughout (singular vs. plural, capitalisation, etc.), preferably using standard indexing conventions
  • One grouping approach uses nouns as the first level entries with verbs as the second level

would read better as follows:
Everyone has...

  • Ensuring...
  • Analysing...
  • Using...
  • Using...

Feedback, anyone? Regards, --Technopat (talk) 18:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference section[edit]

This article is helpful about principles of indexing, but the reference section is less than helpful; for example, some of the books listed do not have proper citations, so I (who want to know about indexing) am not sure where to find them. Can whoever added the refs provide proper citations? Or will I have to do it, as part of some cunningly-prearranged scheme to make me a better editor? Lexo (talk) 00:43, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Index Quality[edit]

The example for the next-to-last pitfall is unclear and should be changed.

Failure to sort properly: e.g. placing 'McTavish' after 'MacRobertson' instead of after 'machines'

If I'm interpreting it right, the issue seems to be whether 'McTavish' should be sorted as M-C or as M-A-C. However, these three headings will appear in the order

machines
MacRobertson
McTavish

regardless of which convention is used. Perhaps replacing 'machines' with 'McTaggart' gets closer to what was intended.

Devising an example of a sorting mistake based on "Mc" names is a little awkward to do, because practice varies. It used to be that "Mc" was treated as if spelled M-A-C, but recently it's become common to alphabetize exactly as spelled. Alarich2 (talk) 21:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of indexes[edit]

Needed : When the first book with an index has been published? How indexes have changed over time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.67.232.89 (talk) 13:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indexing of serials[edit]

Another topic to be added to this article: indexing of serials (newspapers, magazines, etc.). --Una Smith (talk) 00:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed, unsourced sections.[edit]

Several were removed, but if referenced should go back. -- Jeandré, 2011-07-10t18:37z

"Appendix"[edit]

The usage and primary topic of Appendix is under discussion, see talk:Vermiform appendix -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 05:46, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Index (publishing). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indexing using Excel[edit]

It is easy to make Indexes using Excel, perhaps this should be added to the article 86.143.211.107 (talk) 20:48, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Index (publishing). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Index journal[edit]

create a section about the quality indicator for scholarly journals called journal indexing please , below the reference: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3354504/ Hastengeims (talk) 16:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Index_(publishing)&oldid=1202939729"