Talk:Indenture

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal[edit]

Merge proposal with indentured servant

Don't merge I think the topics people are expecting to find when searching for indenture vs. indentured servant are sufficiently different that they should not be merged. Emfraser 01:36, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. David Spector (talk) 15:06, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. indentured servant comes with a lot of historical baggage that really doesn't belong here. --AnalyticalHistoricalHobbyist (talk) 15:48, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Section for indentures during the 100 Years War needed[edit]

Hi, y'all!! Since my article A Gest of Robyn Hode is already bursting at the seams, I need to point to somewhere for a discussion re Edward III's indentures for the 100 Years War, & it should be here – there it is – 3 sentences in the middle of all those land transactions. I guess I just volunteered to insert such a section. Shortly; sometime soon, before I file my research ... Ta-ta for now! --AnalyticalHistoricalHobbyist (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]