Talk:In the Bedroom

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Maine Low‑importance

	Maine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:ITB.jpg[edit]

Image:ITB.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Image-ITB.jpg[edit]

Image:Image-ITB.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a great film, but who wrote this comically overblown review/description? Someone a bit too much in love with their own fulsome prose style!

Manslaughter may seem an unfortunate but reasonable prosecutorial option given the evidence, rather than implying a corrupt or incompetent prosecutor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.125.115.232 (talk) 12:05, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Completely agreed...this review needs to be revisited and revised...I am more than confident that someone used a thesaurus to write this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkfo (talk • contribs) 23:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone needs to fix this page. The plot synopsis is weird, and everything is just everywhere. No viable sections or parts to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.110.196.43 (talk) 03:21, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Tom & Sissy.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plot synopsis[edit]

Synopsis seems far too long..? I'm not comfortable cutting it back without some kind of consensus. What are others' thoughts? 2A01:4C8:C0A:12DA:E0C5:2AEA:57D8:1905 (talk) 23:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]