Talk:Ibero-America

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List 'em[edit]

It might be helpful to list precisely which nations constitute Iberoamerica, as no doubt there are many who are unfamiliar with this term. ekedolphin July 6, 2005 03:24 (UTC)

Haiti[edit]

Why is haiti shaded in on the map? -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 18:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

edit from a non member

sorry, dont know how to post a new one...

just to point out that French Guiana is also shaded in on the map

Andorra[edit]

User:Marianocecowski reverted a recent change with the message "Andorra not part of the Iberian Peninsula!". Although it may be debatable whether Andorra is part of the peninsula or not, it recently became a member of the Organizacion de Estados Iberoamericanos [1], so I think it's worth mentioning both in the article text and in the figure caption.--Itub 18:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Equatorial Guinea[edit]

i know they're neither american or iberian, and only know that spanish is an official language. do they fall under the category of hispanohablante countries that commune with spain and the others? can they be included in this article or should they be, even as an aside to mention non-participation (if that's the case)? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.82.3.91 (talk) 04:39, 28 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Cleaned up the definitions/intro[edit]

Hi. I know nothing about this topic, but before my edit, there were three different definitions, and no explanation of their relationship (so each was claiming to be the definition). I've reduced it to two definitions: one is the Spanish and Portuguese speaking countries of Latin America, and the other is those plus the Iberian peninsula of Europe, and I've noted that there are two definitions, so the reader knows that it's not a mistake. Some review would be good. I presume there is no "one true definition". Gronky 02:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "one true definition", but for some official purposes the member list of the Organization of Ibero-American States can provide a good working definition. --Itub 18:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

error[edit]

spain aren't is in america. portugal aren't is in america. andorra aren't is in america. andorra never had got a colony in america. if includes in america spain, portugal and andorra, why no includes usa in this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.19.29.234 (talk) 15:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

stupid! Spain and Portugal estan en la P.Iberica pro eso IBEROamerica

I agree to 88.19.29.234. If Ibero-America includes Portugal, Spain and Andorra, then Latin-America should include these three countries plus France, Monaco, San Marino, Italy, Moldova and Romania, right? As well Hispanic-America should include Spain too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.8.126.110 (talk) 02:38, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please, read the article properly before coming here to discuss non-issues. It just clutters the page. Thank you. The Ogre (talk) 13:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hispanics in the United States - requested move[edit]

Hello everyone. There is at present a discussion going on at Hispanics in the United States, due to the request that the page be moved to Hispanic Americans. Would you like to comment please? Thank you. The Ogre 18:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't make sense to move this to "Hispanic Americans", since that is not what is being discussed. The article is on the use of terms "Ibero-America" ans "Ibero-American" in specified context, e.g. the summits mentioned.--- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.60.55.7 (talk) 17:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion[edit]

Latin America and Ibero-America? Different names for the same thing right? Merge? Gregcaletta (talk) 01:52, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Close, but not exactly. Ibero-America would NOT include French speaking parts of Latin America. ludahai 魯大海 (talk) 12:26, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, not even close. In fact, besides not coinciding geographically (furthermore for the fact that in some definitions Ibero-America includes the Iberian Peninsula!), they constitute two opposed visions of what should we call Spanish and Portuguese speaking America. The Ogre (talk) 12:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dominica?[edit]

Should Dominica be included among the English speaking countries that is not part of Ibero-America? 14 January 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.216.128.89 (talk) 21:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

European countries shouldn't be included[edit]

European countries aren't in Ibero-America, compare version in Spanish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by André Martín Espinal Lavado (talkcontribs) 19:19, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semantics[edit]

Just a complaint that semantics, the bane of the English language, have thoroughly jacked this article. And that a linguistics pro is needed here, badly. Sadsaque (talk) 17:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guyana and Suriname[edit]

The second paragraph in the lead implies that Guyana and Suriname are part of Latin America. These countries should be removed. Corndog234 (talk) 12:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the wording to try to clarify that. --Jotamar (talk) 13:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ibero-America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ibero-America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]