Talk:Hurricane Beatriz (2011)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Beatriz (2011) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 16, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Question[edit]

Why is a separate article created for Beatriz? Why didn't Adrian get one then? 89119 (talk) 02:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian had little/no impact on land while Beatriz has prompted hurricane warnings. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:50, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Beatriz got an article because it is threatening land as we speak. Adrian should i have gotten one, and I myself /might write Adrian in a day or two. YE Tropical Cyclone
Adrian can still get one, based on its high intensity. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 02:56, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention Adrian did prompt tropical storm watches. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:03, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Adrian doesn't need an article. As per Cyclonebiskit, "Adrian had little/no impact on land". Adrian only prompted a tropical storm watch for western Mexico. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 09:12, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming non-NHC sources can be found, it should get one to due its high intensity. YE Tropical Cyclone 13:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Beatriz (2011)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 15:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here are my comments

  • "Originating from an area of disturbed weather on June 19, 2011, several hundred miles south-southeast of Mexico, Beatriz gradually intensified." no need for 2011 IMO.
  • Wikilink Mexico in lead.
  • Lead should be one paragraph due to lack of impact.
  • "However, the overall effects of Beatriz were limited and the rains were largely beneficial in mitigating a severe drought." I'd changed that to "Overall, effects of Beatriz were minor and the rains were largely beneficial in mitigating a severe drought."
  • "Three hours after classification, the depression strengthened Tropical Storm Beatriz, the named storm of the 2011 Pacific hurricane season." Is it more or is a word missing?
  • Why isn't the recon flight mention in the MH?
  • Wikilink Mexico in MH if you wikilink Guatemala/
  • Any damage totals?
  • Why ins't the SNM report used in the article?
  • I think you got the ref and work fields mixed up. Isn't NHC the publisher and NOAA the work?

Otherwise, it's good. I am leaving this nomination on hold. YE Pacific Hurricane 15:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Passing. YE Pacific Hurricane 15:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hurricane Beatriz (2011). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:50, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]