Talk:Human rights in Vietnam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Human rights in Vietnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged article as self-promotional[edit]

I just added an {{advert}} tag to this article because it is clearly written in a manner and style that promotes the subject. Of particular note is the section "Reporting" which simply spouts the propaganda of the Vietnamese government. There are no sections in the article on freedom of press, freedom of speech, economic freedoms, property rights, bodily integrity, judicial due process, etc. Sparkie82 (tc) 14:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the

tag. The second part of section “Reporting” is about reports from NGO and other government which don’t align with the Party. Danny81133233 (talk) 11:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality[edit]

I might put up a need for a neutrality tag since the article is fairly one-sided. Although there is a need for human rights, it is reasonable to assume that there needs to be a point of view from the other side as well. 14.201.98.19 (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elections[edit]

just one question, there's literally one party legally allowed in Vietnam, and because the point is not to vote for a party, but rather for a person, how is it a "rubber stamp"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:EE0:4001:52:244C:5037:E55B:75E3 (talk) 14:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The candidates are mostly members of the Party, all of them are chosen by the party, then if that is not rubber stamp, what it is.(just in case someone ask, rubber stamp means an institution that is de jure powerful but de facto weak and subordinate to a more powerful institution) Nguyen280405 (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]