Talk:Hugo Award for Best Novelette

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listHugo Award for Best Novelette is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starHugo Award for Best Novelette is part of the Hugo Awards series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 2, 2010Featured list candidatePromoted
August 13, 2011Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured list

Image[edit]

Would somebody care to explain why this list article is illustrated with a picture of Peter Watts? Yes, I know he won the award one year, but that can be said about every other winner. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:38, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because some people think that a list with a giant table really, really needs one (free) image to go with it, and even though I disagree I can't muster up the effort to either fight to take it down every time or go and find enough free images to decorate the list with an entire column of images. If you can find it in your heart to do either, feel free with my blessing, for whatever that's worth (nothing). Graphic story and fan artist have one too. --PresN 01:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yikes! And I thought someone might have had a silly reason for adding it! (Just to be clear -- I'm joking here.) I'll take a shot at removing it. Wish me luck. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 53 external links on Hugo Award for Best Novelette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Format of titles[edit]

Is there any significance as to why some titles in the list are in italics, some have quotation marks and some are just plain ? -- Beardo (talk) 22:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stories which appeared in magazines or collections are in double quotes. Stories which appeared standalone are in italics. Italics are typical for novels and some novellas, but at novelette length, which is fairly short, it's only for works that have been published electronically. There shouldn't be any (and I don't see any) works in plain text. Dan Bloch (talk) 23:07, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
MOS:TITLES talks about this is terms of "major" and "minor" works, but says more or less the same thing, except for the bit about works published electronically. Dan Bloch (talk) 23:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, to be specific, in this list it's also based on what the source (the Hugo list in this case) is formatting them as. --PresN 09:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]