Talk:Horatio Bottomley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleHoratio Bottomley is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 17, 2016.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 19, 2014Peer reviewReviewed
July 27, 2014Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Untitled[edit]

I have restored the Noel Coward section. This is not a hoax. The user who deleted it has made over 250 edits in the last 6 days on every subject under the sun. I do not believe for one second that he has suddenly taken time out to read Brockett & Franklin's "History of the Theatre". I do not know what motivated him to make such an unwarrented intervention. Evelyn Jones 9:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

For the record: An examination of the Brockett book by User: Tim riley reveals that it contains no reference whatever to Bottomley or a lost wallet. This entry was indeed a hoax, which has survived for seven years but has now been permanently removed from the article. Brianboulton (talk) 08:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just to confirm: I did indeed check as described above. Glad this hoax has finally been nailed. Tim riley talk 19:40, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think involvement should be used instead of intervention.... Evelyn Jones Eddieysclusive (talk) 22:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

H. Osborne O'Hagan's "Leaves of My Life" contains a lengthy (in the context of those volumes, anyway) and interesting chapter on Bottomley; an editor interested in augmenting this article would do well to consult it. 96.244.70.173 (talk) 13:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Well done[edit]

I'm writing on Bottomley's involvement in some Australian mining frauds and came here looking for background. I found this an excellent and very helpful article, one of the best I've seen on Wikipedia. Congratulations to writers and editors. Peter Bell (talk) 09:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation of "parliament"[edit]

Although some style guides suggest otherwise, the word "parliament" is generally not capitalised unless it forms part of a construction such as "Member of Parliament", "Houses of Parliament" etc. Personal preferences can differ, but I think we should stick to the format in which the article was promoted to FA. Brianboulton (talk) 07:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]