This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 18 December 2012 by reviewer Ktr101 (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
I noticed that this article refers to the same source several times in several different ways. I combined most of them into an overarching reference (which lists the author, title and publication instead of just the web address). The last two references to this same Motorcycle Classics article I wonder about. Is there a standard way to acknowledge "as quoted by"? Should those references simply be changed to the relevant issues of Cycle and Cycle World, or to the Motorcycle Classics article, or is there a combination that should be used? Has anyone run into this before? Thanks for any insight anyone can offer. Runinthegrass (talk) 22:57, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]