Talk:Hick

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comments[edit]

This is the most poorly written article I have found yet.

because you can't speak English ?
- LOLOLOLOL U SHOWED HIM!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmmmmm (talk • contribs) 07:42, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambig Needed[edit]

Hick needs an disambiguation page. I hit the derogatory term "Hick" when trying to look up the theologian John Hick It is also linked from the "Hicks" disambiguation page 139.102.45.119 18:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Brian M[reply]

Thanks. I put a disambiguation line at the top of the page. --Allen 14:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now it seems the derogatory term is not accessible. - Anon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.156.10.80 (talk) 13:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NOTICE UNREF TEMPLATE[edit]

re: http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/rural_iq/

Rural IQ— this forum type page was given as a fake reference.

The above line was given as a reference, but is not a reliable independent source per WP:V, so I'm Adding an UNREF template in the article, despite the fact I normally do that in Talks. user:fabartus 6 May 2006 FrankB

An article needs more than one reference, as well, so placed SECT_STUB' in references, for hopes someone will be drawn in with time to research these four articles. (i.e. those in the See Also section)
Changed the above link into External reference, but consider than lienient

FrankB 04:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]