Talk:Hiba Abu Nada

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name[edit]

Hello, her username on Twitter is "HebaAbuNada" and on Instagram, it is "Heba", not "Hiba". Nehaoua (talk) 19:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Last words[edit]

@MJL: Starting discussion of her last words regarding this reversion. -- Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Emir of Wikipedia: Yeah, to me, it's pretty straightforward. A secondary source already covered it, and there's no policy reason not to include the subject's final published words. –MJLTalk 19:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder what others think. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with @Sj and @MJL for the inclusion. Please see our policy WP:NOTCENSORED and please try not to violate it. — Kaalakaa (talk) 00:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am not trying to censor anything. Please act in WP:GOODFAITH and do not cast WP:ASPERSIONS. -- Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cause of death phrasing[edit]

"On 20 October 2023, she was killed in the Israel–Hamas war, during an airstrike by the Israeli Air Force, which hit her home in Khan Yunis in southern Gaza."

This sentence could be phrased better I think. It uses two "during" timeframes, and splits the verb and direct object. Maybe splitting it into two statements, and using a more direct sentence structure would make it clearer? Also, using a piped link could convey the scope better in this instance; the name of the conflict lacks consensus (checking it's talk page) and as it's used here, might give a false impression that the subject was a participant or combatant instead of a bystander. For example:

"On 20 October 2023, she was killed by an airstrike conducted by the Israeli Airforce, which destroyed her home in Khan Yunis. The airstrike was part of an [2023_Israel–Hamas_war|Israeli campaign] in southern Gaza." 24.249.89.69 (talk) 21:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedian[edit]

The article says she was a Wikimedian. Would it be appropriate to link to her userpage, either on the main page or on the talk page? Is there a relevant Wikipedia policy when notable people have died, who were also active on Wikimedia, even though that was not their source of notability? --Gerrit CUTEDH 09:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was she really a Wikipedian? The only source states (in Spain): "Heba Abu Nada era también colaboradora en Wikipedia, en 2021 se ofreció como voluntaria en la enciclopedia virtual a través del programa de educación a distancia, que se llamó WikiWrites" But only WikiWrite I found is some kind of failed proposal, withdrawned in 2017: https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=WikiWrite&action=history --Nicoljaus (talk) 10:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps not WikiWrites, but WikiRights project is meant: https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/ويكيبيديا:ويكي_رايتس
Well, that make sense. "Next October, the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor will launch the second session of the “WikiRights” project in the Palestinian territories, providing a series of free training covering all aspects that serve to enhance human rights content in the Wikipedia encyclopedia and do justice to the victims’ narratives. It also includes Basic skills in encyclopedic editing, and methods of modifying Wikipedia articles." Nicoljaus (talk) 16:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]