Talk:Helwan HA-300

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeHelwan HA-300 was a Warfare good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 19, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

Citations[edit]

Please note, this is not a GA review, but it may help with future review processes.

The internet inline citations used in this article are improperly formatted and this problem may hinder a GA nomination. Internet citations require at the very least information on the title, publisher and last access date of any webpages used. If the source is a news article then the date of publication and the author are also important. This information is useful because it allows a reader to a) rapidly identify a source's origin b) ascertain the reliability of that source and c) find other copies of the source should the website that hosts it become unavaliable for any reason. It may also in some circumstances aid in determining the existance or status of potential copyright infringments. Finally, it looks much tidier, making the article appear more professional. There are various ways in which this information can be represented in the citation, listed at length at Wikipedia:Citing sources. The simplest way of doing this is in the following format:

<ref>{{cite web|(insert URL)|title=|publisher=|work=|date=|author=|accessdate=}}</ref>

As an example:

  • <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.discovery.org/a/3859|title=Avoiding a Thirty Years War|publisher=www.discovery.org|work=[[The Washington Post]]|date=2006-12-21|author=Richard W. Rahn|accessdate=2008-05-25}}</ref>

which looks like:

  • Richard W. Rahn (2006-12-21). "Avoiding a Thirty Years War". The Washington Post. www.discovery.org. Retrieved 2008-05-25.

If any information is unknown then simply omit it, but title, publisher and last access dates are always required. I strongly recommend that all internet inline references in this article be formatted properly before this article undergoes GA review, and indeed this is something that a reviewer should insist you do before promoting your article. If you have any further questions please contact me and as mentioned above, more information on this issue can be found at Wikipedia:Citing sources. Regards

thanks a lot you have helped in changing forever the way I cite. Completing now the citation process.Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 22:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
When you put in a duplicate reference, you just have to close it -- you can close a tag by either putting in a </something> or by putting a / at the end of the first tag, like <something/>, so you don't have to put anything inside the duplicated reference, unless you want to. :) Banaticus (talk) 11:32, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Helwan HA-300/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
You have good references, all of your pictures seem to be freely available, so that's all good. I think some of the language might be spruced up a little bit, like "There were 3 prototypes built until the termination of the project at the end of 1969, due to lack of finance and pressure from Russia." -- change "until" to "before". "afterburning rating of 4800kgp.[3]India also" -- add a space before India after the reference. More things could have wikilinks the first time they're mentioned, like years, months, Mach, country names. So, there are some tiny things to fix up, but otherwise I think the article is good. Banaticus (talk) 11:41, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again and I completed the task more critique is welcomeDiaa abdelmoneim (talk) 13:44, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for improvement[edit]

A few suggestions for improvement so the article will be able clear GA and A-class reviews, and maybe even FA:

  • Expand the intro to at least two paragraphs, preferably three if at all possible.
  • See if you can add any additional information about the project; its a small article, so adding relevent information and expanding sections to the best of your ability will help your chance for improvement.
  • Source the specifications section, this kind of material requires sourcing so as to comply with the milhist MoS.
  • Check your internet sources at the reliable sources noticeboard, some of them seem a little iffy for long term use, so the sooner you know for sure whether they can stay the better.

Beyond these points everything looks good to go, although I may add a few comments later after I eat (its dinner time here). TomStar81 (Talk) 02:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's the milhist MoS and where's the reliable sources noticeboard? Thanks. :) Banaticus (talk) 19:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The milhist MoS is the Military History Manual of Style, and here is the reliable sources noticeboard! Chrisfow (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diaa abdelmoneim, you have done a very commendable job raising this article from a stub! Egypt’s aviation endeavors are poorly known and this will be a good step toward making more information available. It still has a way to go to achieve GA status, though, and I concur with TomStar81 that what it most needs is some expansion on coverage; stylistically, it’s in pretty good shape. Specific information that might be added or expanded upon are

  • The Spanish phase of the HA-300’s design and development, including Messerschmitt’s role in initiating the program, and why the Spanish grew disenchanted with it.
  • How the Egyptian government became interested in it (in lieu of other options), how it fit into its plans to develop an indigenous aviation industry (through the Egyptian General Aero Organization), and what notable individuals were associated with the design program.
  • How the Indians became involved and the source of the confusion over whether the Egyptians were committing to the HF-24.
  • A general description of the design, including pointing out what innovations the aircraft featured.
  • How the first prototype performed in flight.
Hope these suggestions are of value. Askari Mark (Talk) 03:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stilted grammer[edit]

Some of the sections are a little stilted (stiff and artificially formal) and could be reworked. Take this sentence, for instance:

The test flight for the glider, being towed by an He-111, wasn't completed due to instability and the airplane didn't even get airborne.

The mention of the He-111 towing the glider breaks the flow of the sentence. It would be better to rework that into something like:

Towed by an He-111, the test flight for the glider wasn't completed due to instability and the airplane didn't even get airborne."

This version uses the common American colloquialism "never got off the ground", which means the probject was never completed. It's somewhat of a pun here and it which makes the sentence flow a little more smoothly:

Originally planned to be towed by an He-111, the test flight for the glider never got off the ground, due to instability problems.

Although I'm not particularly happy with the first dependant clause there, by suggesting that they'd planned to have an He-111 tow the glider, instead of saying that it was towed by it, we avoid the problem of "How was the glider towed by an He-111 if it never even got off the ground?" If the glider was actually towed around on the runways, is there any more information on what happened during the towing? So let's see if we can't rephrase it a little more, like:

Messerschmitt planned to have an He-111 tow the glider but, due to instability problems, the test flight for the glider never got off the ground.

That'd be good, or something like that. ;)Banaticus (talk) 19:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

citations and coverage[edit]

There are several fact tags that need to be covered with cites and one online source needs a telling name and a date of retrieval.

The coverage is not complete. Go for Kurt Tank. He was involved with fighter designs in India, Egypt and Argentinia and in Egypt special airbase was established for this fighter. These designs were based on German designs during WWII because of the limited test capabilities in these countries. Wandalstouring (talk) 17:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

added the citations --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 11:04, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): (Kurt Tank and his crew are missing, not OR in the strict sense but it is like telling about American aircraft pioneers and not mentioning the Wright brother)
    • References needed:
    a (major aspects): (all technical data needs cites) b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Willy Messerschmitt[edit]

In the HA-300 article the quotation is He therefore moved to Spain where he set up the Hispano Aviación aviation company and started designing an ultra light fighter aircraft in 1951. But in the article on Hispano Aviación it is stated the manufaturer was founded in 1939. As the link to EADS is dead, I'm not sure what the correct version is (I can guess...) --Antheii (talk) 13:32, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Helwan HA-300. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Helwan HA-300. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Helwan HA-300. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Helwan_HA-300&oldid=1206126797"