Talk:Heath Irwin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Heath Irwin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Teratix (talk · contribs) 12:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am quickfailing this article as it is too far away from meeting GAC 3(a), "addresses main aspects" and 3(b) "stays focused on topic". As a representative example, Irwin's entire NFL regular-season career is summed up in two sentences: He played 87 NFL regular season games, starting 29. He was a member of the Patriots from 1996 to 1999, the Dolphins in 2000 and 2001 and the 2002 St. Louis Rams. For comparison, the article dedicates more than twice as many words to covering his uncle's Colorado career. This is not reasonable. – Teratix 12:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Review response[edit]

You blanked my commentary on your review at Talk:Heath Irwin/GA1. Here is what I placed on your talk page: User:Teratix, you have clearly misstated the content of the Heath Irwin article. You have stated that the career section, which is 6 sentences long, is 2 sentences. His uncle is discussed for 3 sentences. I assume you are lieing to pick a fight. Is that your intention. WP:WIAGA is based on whether the subject is presented in a fairly complete manner, not whether it is lengthy. That is a pretty complete summary of his career unless you can point out something that is missing.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]