Talk:Hate to Love You

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It has notable references[edit]

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=%22Makoto+Tateno%22+%22hate+to+love+you%22+-blog&fp=1&cad=b If anyone fills like adding in additional external links, just Google for the name of the author and the manga, minus the word "blog", as I did, and see what pops up. I added two references I don't think anyone can object to. Dream Focus (talk) 21:12, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Culture Junkies is a self-published group blog, and as such doesn't meet our guidelines for WP:RS. Boys on Boys on Film links to copyright violating material, and as such cannot be linked to or used as a source. (Which is a shame, as they come a lot closer to being reliable.) (Believe me, I sorted through the first 200 g-hits for this series, looking for reliable sources. I couldn't find any beyond the Mania.com review.) —Quasirandom (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brigid Alverson[edit]

Brigid Alverson's blog is considered a WP:RS for reviewing manga as she writes for Publishers Weekly. --Malkinann (talk) 23:43, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hate to Love You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]