Talk:Hage Geingob

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The contents of this article were, probably by mistake, first listed in the African politician stub. I moved the information to here, but it remains to be wikified.

LHOON 22:24, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

The reference to "apartheid regime" is politically biased. South African government or authorities would be less POV.203.184.41.226 (talk) 08:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's one way of putting it. But after the UN revoked the South African mandate to govern South-West African territory in 1966, "regime" is actually less POV than "government", and apartheid was introduced in 1948. The entire paragraph is actually unreferenced, how about digging up a ref and take over a wording that is supported there? --Pgallert (talk) 21:17, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The UN had no authority whatsoever to revoke a mandate of governance. And well. South African government is for sure applicable to a government of the Republic of South Africa. Regime is problematic since it's quite equivocating with its meaning. It can be simply a name typifying a form of government or policy or - when used in propaganda - the word signifies something rather denigration about another government. Apartheid is a propaganda term right from the beginning. First as slogan of the National Party, which then was rather gladly picked up by its opponents. 105.0.1.80 (talk) 19:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Who else than the institution that awarded the mandate would have the authority to take it away? "South African government" is all fair and fine, for as long as it governs South Africa. If it governs an illegally occupied territory... well, I'm sure you know what I am going to say. Re:"Regime": If you have a better word for an administration that suppresses the majority of the territory's citizens, let's hear. --Pgallert (talk) 11:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Hage Geingob. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Hage Geingob. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hage Geingob/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I rated this as start class for the relative lack of references, and low priority as an early African politician who does not appear to have had impact must past the office he held. Staxringold talkcontribs 23:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 23:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 16:57, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hage_Geingob&oldid=1203186443"