Talk:Ha!-Ha!-Ha!

Song Summaries

Just a note that I edited the song summary section, "The Frozen Ones" was cited as having the feedback ending that led into "Distant Smile", in the fact the song with the feedback is "Fear in the Western World" (FITWW and DS follow "The Frozen Ones" as the 3rd and 4th tracks respectively). Note that this leaves The Frozen One as uncommented, if someone wants to put something in that would be great (can't think of much to say about it, though I like it). Thanks- 65.120.75.6 (talk) 21:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Tim

Well done spotting that! Yes, I like it too and will endeavour to say something about it if/when I ever get round to adding to this article, which is on my long list of Things To Do... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Post-Punk?

Mmmmm...and New Wave? I think Post-punk is more associated with Goth and indie.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Francodamned (talk • contribs) 10 November 2008 16:33 (UTC)

Post-punk makes sense to me for this but if you want to change to New Wave I'm not fussed... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

A Contribution For The Italian Page

Hi all! I recently posted the new italian page for the Ultravox`s Album Ha!-Ha!-Ha!. I just translated the english page and for the genre i used the same in use in the english version: Post Punk, suddenly a young italian boy changed it, he must be a deeply punk maniac so he wrote that this song`s genere is New Wave ,Progressive Rock and Dance rock. May be new wave could be accepted but not progressive nor dance, his external link is the same in use in the english page http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kcfixql5ldde%7Clingua= and in this link the first style displayed is New Wave/Punk , but since there is no wiki voice for New wave/punk together , u guys wrote post-punk so I did the same for the new italian page. Does anybody think that we should accept to see in the italian page of Ha!Ha!Ha! that the genre is dance and progres? This guy keeps on edit it and I keep on delete his edition , now he threats me that i could be banned for Vandalism. What to do? How can we stop him? Thank you! --Carlo58s (talk) 05:04, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ha!-Ha!-Ha!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050211063010/http://home.tiscali.se/musicworld/ultravox-interview2.html to http://home.tiscali.se/musicworld/ultravox-interview2.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041204165314/http://www.newtimesbpb.com/Issues/2003-11-20/music/music2.html to http://www.newtimesbpb.com/issues/2003-11-20/music/music2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 26 December 2017 (UTC)