Talk:Gyerim-ro dagger and sheath

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gyerim-ro dagger and sheath article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Central Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal Gyerim-ro dagger and sheath is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Blades (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blades, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BladesWikipedia:WikiProject BladesTemplate:WikiProject BladesBlades articles

Untitled[edit]

--Maddie You're off to a terrific start and have already assembled the kernel of an excellent entry. Here are a few considerations as you revise:

your draft does a good job of including links to other Wikipedia entries, but maybe add a few more (though, as an aside, I'm surprised Gyerim-ro as a site doesn't have an entry, maybe you can make one over break now that you have the Wikipedia entry writing superpower).
This can be deleted since the footnote tells the source for the info :"The special exhibition highlights from the Metropolitan Museum of Art explains that" Similarly "research of Kageyama, Etsuko from Kyoto University" can be omitted from the main text, but regardless if you're mentioning someone in a sentence you'd give their first name first.

Same issue as above for " International Journal of Korean History " mention in the body of a sentence.

Why is

Knowledge of the Silk Road informs that trade between Central Asia and East Asia was affluent and thriving during the 5th century, and thus the occurrence of a Black Sea area item in a Korean tomb should not come as a surprise.

its own sentence? You're making a good point, but how can it be more fluidly interwoven into the body of your other description and anlaysis.

overall the final paragraph needs to be more explicitly linked to your sword so that it doesn't seem like general background
don't forget to bring in some images from Wikimedia commons, it looks like there are some nice ones already there fortunately

Please touch base if you have any questions!

AMcClanan (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Madeline! You have a ton of great information about your topic here; lengthwise I think it's looking very good. Nice job linking relevant Wikipedia articles on certain topics. Your sources are reliable and informative, but you can probably take out the parts where you write the source author's name in favor of just a citation. I'm not sure if this is adding to another article or starts a new one, but a header or subheading for your writing should be added at some point. One more recommendation I have is that your second paragraph ends by talking about the appendages of the sheath and handle, when instead you might combine that piece of information with the following paragraph that talks about that aspect specifically.

--Sagemw (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Madeline! Great job! You talk about the dagger in multiple ways, from it being used as a gift, to its phsyical characteristics, and relation to the silk road. I was most curious about its history, and maybe even why it was created in the first place, since you mentioned it was once used in a burial, and also used as a diplomatic gift. Were you able to find any information on why it was considered a treasure, or why it was originally created? Great job digging into this topic from multiple ways! Saranewcom (talk) 02:39, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]