Talk:Greed (game show)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleGreed (game show) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 2, 2022.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 13, 2021Good article nomineeListed
May 9, 2021Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 19, 2021Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Untitled[edit]

"which he believes would still be on the air had Fox not pulled the plug" hahaha 160.39.190.180 04:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the statement certainly has a firm grasp of the obvious. Someone has to choose to stop the series, so yes, it would keep going unless someone pulled the plug... SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:36, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't something be mentioned about the 'dotcom' group? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.234.201.111 (talk) 16:56, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what happened to the section on The Terminator, but I can't make heads or tails of it anymore. Warberd (talk) 04:18, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

who was Greed's announcer?[edit]

Was the announcer for greed a prerecorded voice? Or someone in person off stage/camera. I've never seen chuck refer to him. Not even say "thank you so and so" as he at least did with Jay Stewart or Charlie on scrabble---- no1inthere —Preceding unsigned comment added by No1inthere (talkcontribs) 16:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The announcer from Greed was Mark Thompson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.228.56.16 (talk) 19:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Greed (game show). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Greed (game show). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Greed (game show)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 12:32, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:32, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

  • Improve the non-free rationale for the poster with this template.
  • Is the "approx." note needed? If it is, can it be referenced?
    • minus Removed the note, most hour-long shows range from 42-44 minutes without commercials, Greed included. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 20:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Instead of using "<br>" and "<br />", use "plainlist" per the rules on the infobox.
  • That being said, I couldn't find any issues with the lead.

Gameplay[edit]

  • "each individual team member" → "each team member"
  • "Prior to the $2,000,000 question" → "Before the $2,000,000 question"
  • The last sentence in #Greed:_Million_Dollar_Moment needs a reference.

Production[edit]

  • "hinting a" → "hinting at a"
  • Other than that, every other section looks good.

Reception[edit]

References[edit]

  • Archive all archivable sources (either manually or with this tool).
  • Optional, but try linking websites in each citation.
    • Not exactly sure what you mean here, the only website I could think of adding to the episode citations would be YouTube for the handful of episodes that are available, and the refs for the book sources link to the bibliography section already. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 20:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bcschneider53: It just means that for example, if a source is from the Chicago Tribune, to link it with "|website=[[Chicago Tribune]]". However, it is optional, and all my other suggestions have been addressed, so I am passing the article. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress[edit]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

@Some Dude From North Carolina: I believe all points have been addressed, please don't hesitate to let me know if you need anything else from me. Thanks for the quick review! --Bcschneider53 (talk) 20:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]