Talk:Grant Park Music Festival

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGrant Park Music Festival has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 8, 2010Good article nomineeListed
May 25, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
July 9, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
January 25, 2022Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 26, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the Grant Park Music Festival, a Chicago tradition since its 1931 introduction by Anton Cermak, is America's only remaining free, outdoor concert series featuring classical music?
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 1, 2012, July 1, 2015, July 1, 2019, and July 1, 2023.
Current status: Good article

Not the Nation's Only Free, Outdoor Classical Music Series[edit]

This is not even the nation's only free, outdoor classical music series within 200 miles of Chicago. Madison, WI's Concerts on the Square is also free, outdoor, classical music series. Jelloman (talk) 00:11, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Grant Park Music Festival/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adabow (talk) 10:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Comments

Some issues, I have described them by criterion and section, specifying which paragraph in the section the issue occurs.

Well written[edit]

Prose

Some minor capitalisation and spelling problems

  • Lead (infobox): "classical music festival" → "classical music festival"
  • 'Funding' section (third paragraph): "Grammy-Nominated" → "Grammy-nominated"
  • 'History' section (final paragraph):
    • "(Made in Chicago)" → "(made in Chicago)"
      • This is actually the name of a music series, so I put it in quotes. Since it is a proper noun, I think the caps are correct.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • "Cuban Classical and jazz clarinetist Paquito D'Rivera" → "Cuban classical and jazz clarinetist Paquito D'Rivera"
  • 'Performances' section
    • First paragraph: "Harris Theater hosts an occasional Grant Park Music Festival events." → incorrect grammar, a rewording may be needed
    • Second paragaph – 1930s: bariton → baritone
    • Third paragaph – 1940s: "Other performers included sopranos Claire," – Claire who? Explain.
    • Penultimate paragraph – 2000s: "Other performers include pianist Valentina Lisitsa, soprano Jonita Lattimore, baritone Nathan Gunn, mezzo-soprano Jennifer Larmore." → "Other performers include pianist Valentina Lisitsa, soprano Jonita Lattimore, baritone Nathan Gunn and mezzo-soprano Jennifer Larmore."
  • There seems to be a inconsistency in lists of whether a comma is included after the penultimate item. Pick one format and stick with it. (eg. "One, two and three." or "One, two, and three.")
MoS

Pretty good, however the infobox uses contains hyphens, and should instead contain spaced en dashes, and there are some dab links to fix

Accurate/verifiable[edit]

References

No major issues

Reliable sources

Citation 6 is dead—try to find an archived copy or a replacement reference

Original research

No major issues

Coverage[edit]

Broad coverage

Detailed on history, funding and performances. Is there enough material to create a section on public reception or popularity?

  • I can probably put something together.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I have not found much critical reception. I could add a lot of stuff from the local newspapers, which say that you can't miss this, but I don't think that is really important. Will keep my eye out for more.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Focused

The 'performances' section is quite detailed. I am supposing that the festival is set to continue in the future, and this section could become quite large. It would be good to start to write a List of Grant Park Music Festival performances, to relieve some of the pressure on this section.

  • I think that is a highly unusual list for a performing venue. What this section means to do is briefly highlight each decade. The problem may be that going foward each year gets as long of a summary as the prior decades. I am not a scholar of classical music and not qualified to winnow down each decade list to the true highlights, but I hope for help from other wikipedians in this regard.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral point of view

No major issues

Stability

No edit warring, no frequent vandalism

Images[edit]

Image tags/copyright
Image captions

Very good captioning

Final comments[edit]

I have placed the review on hold, and will allow seven days for the issues outlined above to be rectified. Good luck improving the article! Adabow (talk) 10:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have passed the article. Congratulations! Adabow (talk) 06:24, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User edit[edit]

The bug fix in the infobox on 6 September 2010 at 17:27 was by me, I just forgot to log in. I apologize. --Kris159 (talk) 17:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Grant Park Music Festival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:20, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grant Park Music Festival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]