Talk:Graham Allison

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This article needs to say more about Allison's background. Was he born a blue-blood, or into a blue-collar family? What did his father (Allison, Sr.), mother, and siblings (if any) do for work? Is he married, divorced, does he have kids? Besides fly-fishing, what are his hobbies? He's a Democrat, his wife Elizabeth is a Republican (economist). Etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.8.17.117 (talk) 15:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree. Pablete85 (talk) 22:26, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Graham T. Allison. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

heers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Napata102 (talk) 22:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC) Someone erased an edit without justification. It is important to note any criticism of a work without entering into arguments otherwise it will appear 'undisputed'. Noting the disagreement does not require adjudicating. Many people are always interested to hear a dissenting opinion to allow them to fully understand a position. So I intend to restore the two references. The person d=editing claimed it was a single source but it was two including a former Princeton Professor![reply]