Talk:GovTrack

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Theretiredgymnast. Peer reviewers: Raulcab, Aurabarrera.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GovTrack Peer Review[edit]

Hello Theretiredgymnast,

First, I would like to mention that this a very interesting topic to write about. After reading through your article, I noticed that it was probably too short to fully give the holistic background of this topic. I would like to mention, however, that for the amount of information that was written about this topic, there was a sufficient amount sources and references. Being that GovTrack is still a new idea, I understand that it can be difficult to find sources and write more information. I would advise though, that for your next draft, you should try to include more depth as to the history of GovTrack. Other possible things to include in your article are describing the purpose of GovTrack, elaborating more about the guidelines and if possible, based on the information, discus the future for GovTrack. To end on a positive note, you did stay within the guidelines of Wikipedia in regards to having an unbiased article and including your sources.

BHernandez1723

BHernandez1723 (talk) 06:22, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]