Talk:Glossary of United Kingdom railway terms

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Screamer" nickname for Class 43[edit]

Please don't revert this again. The "Screamer" was a well-known nickname for the Class 43 HST power cars prior to them being re-engined with the VP185 (EMT) or MTU4000 engines. 41001 (the prototype) now has a working Paxman Valenta engine installed, its welcome back tour was named "The Screaming Valenta". Or search for "Valenta scream" on Youtube, or Google. There's your citations. Squirrel (talk) 16:32, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is the responsibility of the content adder to reference where he or she found the facts. While other editors can guess as to the source of the supplied facts, or search, the burden should ideally be on the original editor. This is for several reasons:
  • To show that the facts are true
  • To show that the text was not plagiarized
  • To show that it's not original research
  • So that articles don't grow with an unmaintainable amount of uncited content
It is not my duty to search for you and fill out a citation template. It's disappointing that you expect others to do this chore for you. Therefore, I will temporarily remove this re-addition, but you are welcome (encouraged, in fact!) to reintroduce it with one or more reliable references—ideally secondary sources. You seem to have found sources on YouTube or via Google, so why aren't you supplying a reference or two?
I've been working to improve the quality of this and the other rail glossaries, especially in terms of being properly sourced. These glossaries have had an abundance of slang in the past—some of which appears to have been coined by the editor who posted it. In order to prevent backward progress, I'm going to insist that the free-for-all that this article has been in the past stop. After all, this is an encyclopedia and not a blog or dictionary. Sorry for being stubborn, but I feel that's the only way to get these rail glossaries up to Wikipedia standards. – voidxor (talk | contrib) 22:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BURDEN is policy. Part of one of our core policies, in fact. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:55, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Reference[edit]

Reference 4 is a link to an invitation-only blog. You need to have G-mail account that has been e-mailed by a certain other G-mail account to view this blog. Dr. British12 (talk) 22:07, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Blog references are discouraged anyway per WP:NOTRELIABLE. I have removed the offending citation. Thank you for pointing it out. – voidxor (talk | contrib) 01:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glossary of United Kingdom railway terms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Glossary of United Kingdom railway terms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Glossary of United Kingdom railway terms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]