This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
I am wondering if no one has added a "controversies" or "criticism" section? The company is the most polluting company in the world and also has an abyssal record when it comes to human rights violations. I don't think it should be more than a paragraph but it would be good to mention it. Even Coca Cola has a "criticism" section which links to another page where there is more on the topic. Very subjectively put, this is the most evil company on our planet, I think it would be good to have something measured and balanced about it (again without taking more than a paragraph). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:f140:400:a017:9cfc:e5ef:5746:6dcb (talk) 21:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:LIBEL before making unsupported statements like this. Dormskirk (talk) 23:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You might also want to read this:
In 2006, User:Jimbo Wales weighed in on the question: "In many cases they [criticism sections] are necessary, and in many cases they are not necessary. And I agree with the view expressed by others that often, they are a symptom of bad writing. That is, it isn't that we should not include the criticisms, but that the information should be properly incorporated throughout the article rather than having a troll magnet section of random criticisms."
This article, which already includes plenty of criticism, already complies with that guidance. Dormskirk (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why is Rosneft mentioned in an external link in the "References" section of this article, but mentioned nowhere in the actual text of the current version of this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:18, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you feel like Rosneft should be included, please be bold and add it to the article. That reference is being used to support Qatar Investment Authority being Glencore's biggest shareholder, which is worth including on its own. -M.nelson (talk) 10:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
