Talk:Gilgel Gibe II Power Station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Metres or Kilometres[edit]

Current text says the collapse was over 15km (and converts this to miles) whereas cited reports suggest, pre-inspection, a 15 metre collapse, with the possibility of a by-pass of the section. Which is right? 86.158.24.105 (talk) 20:06, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The article says 15 kilometers collapsed in one place, and 15 meters collapsed in another. That's a pretty large difference... by a factor of 1000. What's the correct number? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.112.86.189 (talk) 20:56, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was 15 meters and corrected. Thank you for pointing that out.--NortyNort (Holla) 21:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On Omo River?[edit]

Gilgel Gibe II power station is built on Giber river, not on Omo river. Gilgel Gibe is a tributary of Omo River but that does not mean the the power station is on Omo. The river is called Omo many kilometers after the dam but around the dam, it is called Omo. Tumsaa (talk) 14:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a sluice dam on the Gibe River which diverts water into a tunnel feeds a power station to the east on the Omo River. The power station discharges the water into the Omo, so it is described as being on the Omo River. The article gets more into detail. You can see a map overview here.--NortyNort (Holla) 00:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gilgel Gibe II Power Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]