Talk:Georgia Twinn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 23:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk). Self-nominated at 13:27, 14 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Georgia Twinn; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Both hooks are sourced and mildly interesting but not compelling; I would like to wait for other eyes before promoting. Go ahead an add an image, if you'd like. —  AjaxSmack  23:31, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Healy performing in Chile in 2017
I have added a reference for the only release not covered by WP:REPCITE and added an image to the article; I may do some more work on this in the morning.--Launchballer 23:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good point about WP:REPCITE; I suppose if they're all save one mentioned in the article text and the list does not claim to be exhaustive, then that should suffice.  AjaxSmack  00:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:REPCITE is giving me indigestion, especially since the discography is a new section. However, since the Spotify citation has all of her releases listed here and the discography is sourced in the article text, it looks fine. All other things look good to go. With the added image, hook ALT0 is more compelling, but since we have no idea if it'll be in the DYK, I'd still like to wait for more input on the hook.  AjaxSmack  14:52, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If it's of any use, an early version of this nom had "... that aged 15, Georgia Twinn went viral on TikTok after lip-synching to a song named after a pornographic actress?" as ALT1, although I suspect that may go against the bit of WP:DYKINT that says "excessively sensational or gratuitous hooks should be rejected".--Launchballer 11:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2: ... that the TikTok success of "Hit or Miss" caused Georgia Twinn to develop hypervigilance? (this one's wikilinked under "more cautious and aware of the types of people that there are online", but the word does not appear)
ALT3: ... that prior to going viral on TikTok for "Hit or Miss" aged fifteen, Georgia Twinn wanted to become a forensic scientist?
ALT4: ... that Lana Del Rey once offered Georgia Twinn Doritos?
Failing that, I might trawl through a couple of her podcasts.--Launchballer 12:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
AjaxSmack ping! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:14, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ALT 2 has WP:BLP issues using a term appearing to be a diagnosis that is not in sources. ALT 3 is fine. ALT 4 is utterly trivial, but in a good way. User:AirshipJungleman29, what do you think?  AjaxSmack  02:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is currently the second oldest nom on T:TDYK. Are ALT3 or ALT4 good to go, and if not what else do I need to do to get this promoted?--Launchballer 14:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. If there're no strong feelings after this long, ALT 4 is good to go. User:Launchballer, if you prefer ALT 3, I have no objection.  AjaxSmack  18:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]