Talk:GeneXpert MTB/RIF

Importance of this page

This page deserves a lot of attention and the importance rank should be increased - this test has been extensively evaluated in many developing world situations in children and adults and represents a great advance over all available technologies in use.

Furthermore, whilst the test is relatively expensive, the cost-effectiveness analyses indicate that it is cost-effective. I don't have the time to put to this yet. In saying this I have no conflicts of interest to declare. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdjkf (talk • contribs) 00:17, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GeneXpert MTB/RIF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140407082202/http://www.finddiagnostics.org/about/what_we_do/successes/find-negotiated-prices/xpert_mtb_rif.html to http://www.finddiagnostics.org/about/what_we_do/successes/find-negotiated-prices/xpert_mtb_rif.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

GeneXpert now being used for SARS-CoV testing

This article may be quite out of date. At a press conference on 10 April 2020, the NSW Premier announced the GeneXpert system was being trialled for SARS-Cov-2 (the virus that causes CoVid-19 in humans) screening in Broken Hill, NSW, Australia. There are a broad range of tests already available via the Cepheid GeneXpert system is described here: https://p.widencdn.net/psq91e/Cepheid-GeneXpert-System-Menu-Flyer-CE-IVD-0293-English And here: https://www.cepheid.com/en/tests At this time, Coronavirus is not listed. But the GX system is clearly used for a broad range of microbiological testing. Searching WP for GeneXpert redirects here to Tuberculosis specific testing on the GX system. This is not within my area of knowledge, so hoping someone else can pick this up as a timely issue, in the expectation that use of GX during the 2020 Covid pandemic may be expanded. I declare I have no commercial interest or relationship with the system manufacturer or its vendors. I simply heard the name GeneXpert during a press conference about the Coronavirus pandemic and came looking for information. Prime Lemur (talk) 02:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

It's a bit out of date, given that Genexpert MTB/RIF Ultra has replaced TB/RIF in most developed nations since 2017 and most labs worldwide by now I assume. Putting SARS-CoV-2 info on this page would be like putting PUBG info on the Fortnite article, they're both video games played on PC's but completely different games. Likewise the Genexpert MTB/RIF is different to the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2, they're both run on Genexpert machines but different assays. I'm a little surprised that an assay has its own Wikipedia article, but that's what happens when the WHO encourages the use of your assay. Serrin (talk) 05:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)