Talk:Gar Alperovitz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

This article should most certainly address recent attacks on his work, most prominently: Robert James Maddox (Ed.): Hiroshima in history: the myths of revisionism.

The first chapter is an attack on Alperovitz specifically as the "godfather of revisionism" while the book goes after the whole idea that the bomb was dropped for any purpose other than as part of the impending Cold War. I do not have the book available, but it is written by serious scholars and the first few pages on amazon.com make Alperovitz seem almost treacherous in his mishandling of the evidence. Someone familiar with his work and its critics should put something in this article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.160.78.186 (talkcontribs) 21:32, 29 January 2008

I hsve the Maddox book in hand and it is pretty much as you describe it. I have added a mention of these criticisms to the article. 192.12.184.2 (talk) 18:32, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll admit to not having read the book, but is it true that, as this review states, it is a set of reprints of essays Maddox wrote over a long period of time rebutting scholars with revisionist views of the bombings? And the Alperovitz writing he was rebutting was published in 1965? Correct me if I'm wrong, but if no one has criticized him in the intervening 50 years, then per WP:CRITICISM we can't just include a big section devoted to outdated attacks on him by other scholars, and if in the intervening time someone has criticized him for these (recently repeated?) problems, then a more recent source would be nice. Also, please explain how "ellipsis" is a misrepresentation of sources. The wording of the section was very poor. Hijiri 88 (やや) 15:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Quite a lot has been written on the subject of the bombs since the 1960's. What's more, in the 1990's more communications intercepts were declassified that substantially undermine Alperovitz's analysis. At this point (in 2020) many historians consider Alperovitz's claims to be decisively disproven, although the debate continues. Richard Frank's book 1999 Downfall is one of the most influential works on the subject. Here's a newspaper article that Frank wrote on the subject: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/why-truman-dropped-the-bomb Nculwell (talk) 21:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Gar Alperovitz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gar Alperovitz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Gar Alperovitz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]